SEQLEC 2000    -   7¼"G Locomotive Efficiency Competition
Sutton Coldfield    -   10th September 2000

Although coal consumption is not a major consideration in the operation of our non-commercial miniature railway operations, it is none the less interesting to know how well and thermally efficiently our locomotives can perform. Indeed, to some model engineers it is seen as a challenge to design an engine that will perform comparably or better than that achieved in the best full-size designs. For the 3½" and 5" gauges, IMLEC has for many years been THE efficiency competition where the best designs have battled it out for supremacy. With the growing popularity of 7¼" gauge, it was only a matter of time before a similar event became established for 7¼" gauge locomotives. And so it was that in 1991 the Bristol SME staged the first 7¼" gauge Locomotive Efficiency Competition, which became known as SEQLEC. The event has been held every year since at various venues around the UK, and every event has received excellent support and coverage by the editorial team of "Model Engineer" magazine, and of course competitors. This year, Sutton Coldfield MES had the pleasure of staging the event again, and the pictures and captions below give a brief account of the runs. No doubt a fuller account will appear in Model Engineer magazine in due course.

 For those unaware of how the locomotive efficiency is measured, it is basically a process of measuring the amount of coal burnt during a nominal 30 minute run and then comparing this to the useful work done by the locomotive in hauling the load around the track. The energy input to the locomotive is determined by measuring the actual amount of coal burnt during the run, and by knowing the calorific value of the coal used enables an "energy input" value to be calculated. The work done (or output)  of the locomotive is recorded on a dynamometer which functions by integrating the distance travelled and drawbar pull, this is presented as a reading of foot-pounds of work done.  The (thermal) efficiency of the locomotive can then be determined by :

                     Work Output (as measured on the dynamometer)
  Efficiency = ---------------------------------------------------------       x  100%
                     Work Input (derived from amount and CV of coal used)

 

Two types of coal were made available for the event, anthracite and an imported South American lignitous type of coal. As it turned out  everyone chose to run with the latter type, which although having a fairly low calorific value burnt with a very hot firebed, but produced long yellow flames and left very little ash or clinker residue. Plenty of top air was ideally required for complete combustion, but when this was not provided smoke (sometimes a fog!) could be observed emanating from the chimneys. We were slightly mischievous in providing this coal as we thought it would provide some "atmosphere" whilst still enabling good steaming.    


The action........         (click on pictures to download larger view)

09100001r.jpg (106846 bytes)

Dscf0511r.jpg (200253 bytes)

Run No.1
Joe Nemeth was first to run with his very attractively turned out non-superheated Hunslet of Reeves design. Joe decided to take 3 passenger cars loaded with a total of 8 passengers. Apart from one derailment, Joe's run was steady and was succesfully completed.

 

Run No.2
John Dalton's GWR 633 Class is basically to Martin Evans's Dart design with modifications. John had a good steady un-eventful run with a very crisp note from the exhaust. At the end of the run I was amazed at the amount of coal returned for weighing back in, however a double check confirmed things to be correct.

Dscf0518r.jpg (211750 bytes)

Dscf0517r.jpg (177889 bytes)

Run No. 3
Another good run by Derek Brown was unfortunately marred by a derailment at Pond Junction. However, Derek managed a good recovery and completed his run in a very composed and apparently relaxed manner.

 

The Permanent Way gang
Following Derek's derailment, some damage was incurred to the track and sleepers. Prompt action by the Permanent Way Gang ensured that the running was able to continue unhindered.

Dscf0521r.jpg (175674 bytes)

Dscf0528r.jpg (154904 bytes)

Run No. 4
Peter Taylor decided on a fairly moderate load, but succesfully completed his 30 minute run at an average speed of nearly 8mph.

Run No. 5
John Painter is a stalwart competitor to this event, achieving Herculean performaces from his Tich locomotive. On this occasion, John was ably assisted by Stuart Duncan who was unfortunately unable to directly participate at this event. John's driving style reputation goes before him, witness the attire adopted by Neal the Observer!
Apart from a derailment during a set-back due to a  priming problem, another excellent run was exhibited by John.

  

Dscf0538r.jpg (200304 bytes)

Dscf0536r.jpg (186368 bytes)

Run No. 6
We managed to twist Mark Bradley's arm sufficiently for him to represent the Sutton Coldfield Society. Mark maintained a steady pace throughout his run, and from the permanent smile on his face seemed to be thoroughly enjoying himself.

 

On the Elevated Track
Throughout the day, Chris Perkins and Dave Barker ran a passenger service on the elevated track with Chris's "Speedy" and "Royal Scot". 

Dscf0539r.jpg (168171 bytes)

Dscf0548r.jpg (161850 bytes)

Next Years entrant??
Steve Daniels and son Jack from Kinver  evidently enjoyed their last visit a few weeks ago and asked if they could bring their Garratt tractor along again. Needless to say, we were of course very pleased to welcome them. The sight of this very fine engine trundling around the field added another dimension of interest throughout the day.

   

The Winning Team
Left to right : John Painter, Peter Taylor, John Dalton, Mike Chrisp (Editor of Model Engineer), Joe Nemeth, Mark Bradley and Derek Brown.

Dscf0540r.jpg (109238 bytes)

Dscf0551r.jpg (91866 bytes)

The Essential Team
Once again, the ladies worked hard keeping us all supplied with refreshments throughout the day - an essential requirement for any event to be a success. Our thanks to Andrea, Rosemary, Margaret and Margaret.       

I've finished with the Abacus for now
Caught just as he was evacuating his post at the end of the day, Roger Timings was in charge of calculating the results from the data gathered by the observers. (None of the rest of us wanted the responsibility of getting it wrong!)

 

The results........

Final
Position

Driver

Locomotive

Run
Duration

(min:sec)

Distance
covered


 (ft)

Coal
Used

(lbs)

Work
Done

(ft.lbs)

Efficiency



 (%)

Average
Speed

(mph)

Average
DB Pull

(lbs)

Average
DBHP


(hp)

Coal
Cons
Rate

(lb/hr)

Specific
Coal Cons

(lb/dbhp/hr)

1

John Dalton

GWR 644

30:32

16428

1.830

479201

2.90 %

6.11

29.17

0.476

3.596

7.561

2

Derek Brown

Hunslet

29:39

17475

2.906

682844

2.60 %

6.70

39.08

0.698

5.881

8.426

3

Peter Taylor

BR Class 2 Tank

30:24

20670

2.797

375272

1.49 %

7.73

18.16

0.374

5.520

14.757

4

John Painter

Tich

31:31

16945

3.142

378592

1.34 %

6.11

22.34

0.364

5.982

16.432

5

Mark Bradley

Hunslet
"Covertcoat"

31:53

14323

4.109

423614

1.14 %

5.10

29.58

0.403

7.733

19.206

6

Joe Nemeth

Hunslet
"Victoria"

29:10

16450

4.860

433115

0.99 %

6.41

26.33

0.450

9.998

22.218

(All competitors used coal from the same source (of South American Lignitus type) having a heat value of 11,600 BTU / lb net)

 

And finally.......

Congratulations to John Dalton with another convincing win.
Our thanks to all the competitors who supported this event, who we hope enjoyed themselves as much as we did. Although the competition is by it's very nature competitive, it also a fun event, and once again the good humour was very much in evidence. Thanks are also due to Mike Chrisp and Model Engineer magazine for the ongoing support given to the various model engineering societies that has enabled this to continue as an annual event. Finally, thanks to the members of Sutton Coldfield Model Engineering Society for their help in staging this event, more than 30 members being directly involved on the day!

Now, who's staging the event next year I wonder ?

 

 

Report by Peter McMillan
10th September 2000
(Updated 29th Sept)